<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/</link>
	<description>For everything Grey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Im happy with firefox and from what hintswens got to say, dont think ill be trying google chrome anytime soon....but hey thats just me =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im happy with firefox and from what hintswens got to say, dont think ill be trying google chrome anytime soon&#8230;.but hey thats just me =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Thanks mate actually we have disabled the filters because they were removing any strings containing a banned term ie essex would remove sex which of course is not acceptable as it restricts our results a point to notice though you mentioned we only returned 1,310 results for your nickname while our filters were running and google gave 1,350 well after taking the filters off our engine also returns 1,350 results which would indicate that 40 of the results being returned had been filtered out (possibly just porn links using references to your site/blog).
If you would like to send me an email or contact me on skype (dginnovations) i&#039;ll arrange some free advertising and links for you

:) Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks mate actually we have disabled the filters because they were removing any strings containing a banned term ie essex would remove sex which of course is not acceptable as it restricts our results a point to notice though you mentioned we only returned 1,310 results for your nickname while our filters were running and google gave 1,350 well after taking the filters off our engine also returns 1,350 results which would indicate that 40 of the results being returned had been filtered out (possibly just porn links using references to your site/blog).<br />
If you would like to send me an email or contact me on skype (dginnovations) i&#8217;ll arrange some free advertising and links for you<br />
 <img src='http://www.hintswen.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hintswen</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Hintswen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Aah but Dave... A higher number of results doesn&#039;t mean a better index. Google doesn&#039;t use a bad word filter AFAIK unless you have &quot;safe searching&quot; on and their results exclude alot of websites that try and cheat and get listed for every keyword known to mankind, so the number of results has nothing to do with it. Even if it did mean a better search engine, that&#039;s one term your search engine beats Google&#039;s on. I tried to search for &quot;hintswen&quot; on a few search enines, here&#039;s the rundown:

Easy Search Live:
Results: 1, 310
#1 - hintswen.stumbleupon.com
#2 - hintswen.com
#3 - hintswen.stumbleupon.com/about

Google:
Results: 1, 350
#1 - hintswen.com
    + Sub entry for hintswen.com/blog
#2 - answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=Z3PuBQxEaa (Yahoo Answers Profile)
#3 - hintswen.stumbleupon.com/tag/browser/
    + Sub entry for hintswen.stumbleupon.com/

Yahoo:
Results: 1, 290
#1 - hintswen.com
#2 - www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/04/11/a-note-for-you
#3 - hintswen.stumbleupon.com/tag/game

Live Search (MSN):
Results: 211
#1 - www.hintswen.com
#2 - forums.whirlpool.net.au/​forum-user.cfm?​id=​140204
#3 - www.borrett.wattle.id.au/​forums/​profile.php?​mode=​viewprofile&amp;​amp;​u=​9

Which search engine returns the best results? In this case I would say Google, It returns my website as first and 2 things I use quite a bit as 2nd and 3rd, Your search engine returns stumble upon twice in the first 3 results and my website is only second, yahoo returns 1 of my blog posts as a seperate retult so that&#039;s out, and Live search is returning a website I can&#039;t even remember using as the 3rd result!

This doesn&#039;t mean the other search engines suck though as they all returnd my website in the top 3 making it easy for people to find it when searching for my nickname.

Oh and I added a link to your search engine on my blog last night =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aah but Dave&#8230; A higher number of results doesn&#8217;t mean a better index. Google doesn&#8217;t use a bad word filter AFAIK unless you have &#8220;safe searching&#8221; on and their results exclude alot of websites that try and cheat and get listed for every keyword known to mankind, so the number of results has nothing to do with it. Even if it did mean a better search engine, that&#8217;s one term your search engine beats Google&#8217;s on. I tried to search for &#8220;hintswen&#8221; on a few search enines, here&#8217;s the rundown:</p>
<p>Easy Search Live:<br />
Results: 1, 310<br />
#1 &#8211; hintswen.stumbleupon.com<br />
#2 &#8211; hintswen.com<br />
#3 &#8211; hintswen.stumbleupon.com/about</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Results: 1, 350<br />
#1 &#8211; hintswen.com<br />
    + Sub entry for hintswen.com/blog<br />
#2 &#8211; answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=Z3PuBQxEaa (Yahoo Answers Profile)<br />
#3 &#8211; hintswen.stumbleupon.com/tag/browser/<br />
    + Sub entry for hintswen.stumbleupon.com/</p>
<p>Yahoo:<br />
Results: 1, 290<br />
#1 &#8211; hintswen.com<br />
#2 &#8211; <a href="http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/04/11/a-note-for-you" rel="nofollow">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/04/11/a-note-for-you</a><br />
#3 &#8211; hintswen.stumbleupon.com/tag/game</p>
<p>Live Search (MSN):<br />
Results: 211<br />
#1 &#8211; <a href="http://www.hintswen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hintswen.com</a><br />
#2 &#8211; forums.whirlpool.net.au/​forum-user.cfm?​id=​140204<br />
#3 &#8211; <a href="http://www.borrett.wattle.id.au/​forums/​profile.php?​mode=​viewprofile&#038;​amp;​u=​9" rel="nofollow">http://www.borrett.wattle.id.au/​forums/​profile.php?​mode=​viewprofile&#038;​amp;​u=​9</a></p>
<p>Which search engine returns the best results? In this case I would say Google, It returns my website as first and 2 things I use quite a bit as 2nd and 3rd, Your search engine returns stumble upon twice in the first 3 results and my website is only second, yahoo returns 1 of my blog posts as a seperate retult so that&#8217;s out, and Live search is returning a website I can&#8217;t even remember using as the 3rd result!</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean the other search engines suck though as they all returnd my website in the top 3 making it easy for people to find it when searching for my nickname.</p>
<p>Oh and I added a link to your search engine on my blog last night =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angus</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d post a review too, but I&#039;m a lazy bugger.

Also, the bookmarks never leave, they&#039;re always there, unless you disable them. Frankly I agree with you, I love the GUI but I don&#039;t like the browser itself, I found over 20 problems/bugs after having used it for only 2 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d post a review too, but I&#8217;m a lazy bugger.</p>
<p>Also, the bookmarks never leave, they&#8217;re always there, unless you disable them. Frankly I agree with you, I love the GUI but I don&#8217;t like the browser itself, I found over 20 problems/bugs after having used it for only 2 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Yeah i think they should put more money into building a decent index i mean it says something when a small hardly known engine like i run can deliver 11 million five hundred one thousand (11,501,000) more results than Google for the same query (phil bradley) they only manage a poor 409,000 results and our bad word filters are harsher than theirs (if they use any) try a comparison http://www.easysearchlive.com and you will see what i mean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i think they should put more money into building a decent index i mean it says something when a small hardly known engine like i run can deliver 11 million five hundred one thousand (11,501,000) more results than Google for the same query (phil bradley) they only manage a poor 409,000 results and our bad word filters are harsher than theirs (if they use any) try a comparison <a href="http://www.easysearchlive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.easysearchlive.com</a> and you will see what i mean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hintswen</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Hintswen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with you Dave, Google Chrome looks so silly, it basically a single colour &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with you Dave, Google Chrome looks so silly, it basically a single colour >.<</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://www.hintswen.com/blog/2008/09/05/google-chrome-review/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hintswen.com/blog/?p=23#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Personally i found Chrome Boring and un-interesting, talk about minimilistic the middle of the sahara has more to stimulate one visually and do we really need yet another browser afterall there is a plethora of them out there already, Google would have been better to spend the money on something worthwhile.

Sorry but for me Chrome scores a big fat zero</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i found Chrome Boring and un-interesting, talk about minimilistic the middle of the sahara has more to stimulate one visually and do we really need yet another browser afterall there is a plethora of them out there already, Google would have been better to spend the money on something worthwhile.</p>
<p>Sorry but for me Chrome scores a big fat zero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
